You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a CIEL curator, I want an OMOP-Standard source in OCL containing the OMOP Standard concepts referenced by CIEL so CIEL mappings can point to a maintained OCL representation of those standard concepts.
Use case
CIEL concepts mapped to OMOP Standard concepts should reference the OMOP-Standard source in OCL. The source should contain only the OMOP concepts currently needed by CIEL rather than importing the complete OMOP vocabulary.
Important
Scope limitation: OMOP currently contains more than 11 million concepts, with approximately 2–3 million Standard Concepts alone. Synchronizing the complete OMOP vocabulary into OCL is not considered feasible at this time due to the storage, indexing, synchronization, and maintenance costs involved. Therefore, this initiative is intentionally limited to importing only the subset of OMOP Standard concepts that are already referenced by CIEL mappings. This provides the interoperability benefits required by CIEL while keeping the source manageable. Expanding beyond this subset should be treated as a separate scalability initiative.
Which attributes from the OMOP concept model are actually required in OCL?
Should the existing omop-loinc representation be reused directly or simplified for this source?
Which OMOP vocabularies/domains should be included initially based on the mappings currently present in CIEL?
What should be the authoritative process for detecting new CIEL → OMOP mappings that require source updates?
More details
Context
The OMOP-Standard source has already been created under the OHDSI organization in OCL.
The objective is not to mirror the complete OMOP vocabulary. The initial scope is to populate only the OMOP Standard concepts that are actually referenced by CIEL.
There is already an OCL representation of OMOP/LOINC that can be reviewed as a model for which OMOP attributes are useful, although it may contain more metadata than this use case requires.
Joe may have additional context on the design of the existing OMOP source and should be consulted before finalizing the attribute set.
User story
As a CIEL curator, I want an OMOP-Standard source in OCL containing the OMOP Standard concepts referenced by CIEL so CIEL mappings can point to a maintained OCL representation of those standard concepts.
Use case
CIEL concepts mapped to OMOP Standard concepts should reference the
OMOP-Standardsource in OCL. The source should contain only the OMOP concepts currently needed by CIEL rather than importing the complete OMOP vocabulary.Important
Scope limitation: OMOP currently contains more than 11 million concepts, with approximately 2–3 million Standard Concepts alone. Synchronizing the complete OMOP vocabulary into OCL is not considered feasible at this time due to the storage, indexing, synchronization, and maintenance costs involved. Therefore, this initiative is intentionally limited to importing only the subset of OMOP Standard concepts that are already referenced by CIEL mappings. This provides the interoperability benefits required by CIEL while keeping the source manageable. Expanding beyond this subset should be treated as a separate scalability initiative.
Requirements
OMOP-Standardwith only those concepts required by CIEL.omop-loincOCL source as a reference for OMOP metadata representation (Did @jamlung-ri buid it?):OMOP-Standardas their external mapping source.Acceptance criteria
OMOP-Standardcontains every OMOP Standard concept currently required by CIEL mappings.OMOP-Standardsource.Questions to be decided @askanter @jamlung-ri
OMOP-Standardremain public?omop-loincrepresentation be reused directly or simplified for this source?More details
Context
The
OMOP-Standardsource has already been created under the OHDSI organization in OCL.The objective is not to mirror the complete OMOP vocabulary. The initial scope is to populate only the OMOP Standard concepts that are actually referenced by CIEL.
There is already an OCL representation of OMOP/LOINC that can be reviewed as a model for which OMOP attributes are useful, although it may contain more metadata than this use case requires.
Joe may have additional context on the design of the existing OMOP source and should be consulted before finalizing the attribute set.