How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
This is a single-context repo.
- Root context:
CONTEXT.md - Root ADR directory:
docs/adr/ - No
CONTEXT-MAP.mdis currently used
CONTEXT.mdat the repo rootdocs/adr/for ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in
If any of these files don't exist, proceed silently. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The producer skill (/grill-with-docs) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
Single-context repo:
/
+-- CONTEXT.md
+-- docs/adr/
| +-- 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
| +-- 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
+-- src/
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in CONTEXT.md. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal: either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for /grill-with-docs).
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders), but worth reopening because...