Skip to content

cmd/cgo: don't use Go parameter names in exported C wrapper body - #82123

Open
houtinghang wants to merge 1 commit into
golang:masterfrom
houtinghang:issue44648
Open

houtinghang wants to merge 1 commit into
golang:masterfrom
houtinghang:issue44648

Conversation

@houtinghang

@houtinghang houtinghang commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Since CL 222619 (Go 1.15), the C wrapper that cgo writes to
_cgo_export.c for an exported function uses the Go parameter names
as the C parameter names. The wrapper body declares a struct whose
fields use the C types of the parameters and results, so a parameter
whose name is the same as a C type name shadows that type and the
wrapper fails to compile:

//export F
func F(writeFunc C.writeFunc) { ... }

_cgo_export.c: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'writeFunc'

Similarly, a parameter named r conflicts with the local variable
that holds multiple results.

Keep the Go parameter names in the declaration in _cgo_export.h,
which is what CL 222619 was for, but use the generated names p0, p1,
... in the definition, as was done before Go 1.15. C does not
require the parameter names of a declaration and a definition to
match, so the header seen by users is unchanged.

AI disclosure: Claude Opus 5.5 assisted with the analysis, the code
and the test in this change.

Fixes #44648

@google-cla

google-cla Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Since CL 222619 (Go 1.15), the C wrapper that cgo writes to
_cgo_export.c for an exported function uses the Go parameter names
as the C parameter names. The wrapper body declares a struct whose
fields use the C types of the parameters and results, so a parameter
whose name is the same as a C type name shadows that type and the
wrapper fails to compile:

	//export F
	func F(writeFunc C.writeFunc) { ... }

	_cgo_export.c: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
	before 'writeFunc'

Similarly, a parameter named r conflicts with the local variable
that holds multiple results.

Keep the Go parameter names in the declaration in _cgo_export.h,
which is what CL 222619 was for, but use the generated names p0, p1,
... in the definition, as was done before Go 1.15. C does not
require the parameter names of a declaration and a definition to
match, so the header seen by users is unchanged.

AI disclosure: Claude Opus 5.5 assisted with the analysis, the code
and the test in this change.

Fixes golang#44648
@gopherbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: 0302d83) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/848406.

Important tips:

  • Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
  • You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
  • To change your code in response to feedback:
    • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
    • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
    • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
    • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
    • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
  • The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
    • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
    • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
  • See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.

@gopherbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
A maintainer will review your change and provide feedback. See
https://go.dev/doc/contribute#review for more info and tips to get your
patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

During May-July and Nov-Jan the Go project is in a code freeze, during which
little code gets reviewed or merged. If a reviewer responds with a comment like
R=go1.11 or adds a tag like "wait-release", it means that this CL will be
reviewed as part of the next development cycle. See https://go.dev/s/release
for more details.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/848406.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cmd/cgo: building c-archive with function pointer works with Go 1.14, but not 1.15 and beyond

2 participants