Skip to content

Commit a73d0ee

Browse files
authored
Add notes from March WG (#1949)
1 parent e8484a9 commit a73d0ee

2 files changed

Lines changed: 44 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

notes/2026/2026-02.md

Lines changed: 17 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
33
**Watch the replays:**
44
[GraphQL Working Group Meetings on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP1igyLx8foH30_sDnEZnxV_8pYW3SDtb)
55

6+
# Primary
7+
68
## GraphQLConf
79

810
- GraphQLConf is live, you can buy your tickets
@@ -64,3 +66,18 @@
6466

6567
- [graphql/nullability-wg#121](https://github.com/graphql/nullability-wg/issues/121)
6668
- Aim: archive the repo
69+
70+
# Secondary
71+
72+
## Defer/Stream
73+
74+
- [https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/pull/1203/changes](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/pull/1203/changes)
75+
- Targets the
76+
[integration branch](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/tree/incremental-integration-response)
77+
- Software that supports the latest version of the protocol
78+
([https://specs.apollo.dev/incremental/v0.2/#sec-RFC](https://specs.apollo.dev/incremental/v0.2/#sec-RFC))?
79+
- apollo-server
80+
- apollo-client
81+
- apollo-ios
82+
- apollo-kotlin
83+
- yoga

notes/2026/2026-03.md

Lines changed: 27 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
1+
# GraphQL WG Notes - March 2026
2+
3+
**Watch the replays:**
4+
[GraphQL Working Group Meetings on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP1igyLx8foH30_sDnEZnxV_8pYW3SDtb)
5+
6+
### GAP status:
7+
8+
- The GraphQL foundation is a GDF project under the LF
9+
- Now we have more specifications, including GAPs
10+
- Benjie: We should clear the legal apects before we merge
11+
- Martin: should we create PRs? Or is it just merging?
12+
- Benjie: not clear. Better wait a little bit.
13+
- Pascal: Relay is mostly about specifications?
14+
- Pascal: do we want consensus or not?
15+
- Michael: what should we do with scalars?
16+
- Lee (in chat): I think we sohuld
17+
- Mark: the hope is to combine them all?
18+
- Benjie: we should have the ability to deprecate
19+
- Martin: is this namespaced?
20+
- Benjie: no, it’s inspired by PEP
21+
- Benjie: it’s hard for naming
22+
- Michael: a name is much clearer
23+
- Pascal: for scalars, namespace is easier
24+
- Michael: how is detection done?
25+
- Benjie: some people mention “not using Relay => no need for Relay connection”
26+
- Benjie: it can be a duck typing thing
27+
- Mark: we can target source schemas rather than runtime schemas

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)