You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most of us are almost running parallel simulations "by default" - realities of modern computing hardware...
This means that the default behaviour of mcrun to not enable MPI feels somewhat old-fashioned? Let alone the annoyance of having built a binary using the default, subsequently running an mpi-enabled run without MPI compiled in...
Should we change the default to always compile MPI support in?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Most of us are almost running parallel simulations "by default" - realities of modern computing hardware...
This means that the default behaviour of
mcrunto not enable MPI feels somewhat old-fashioned? Let alone the annoyance of having built a binary using the default, subsequently running an mpi-enabled run without MPI compiled in...Should we change the default to always compile MPI support in?
All reactions