Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Okay, it was very much an advanced exercise of figuring out a minimal reproduction example. This resulted in neovim/neovim#40964.

I'll wait a bit for what upstream will do here, but everything points out that this is not a 'mini.pick' issue. And although it (probably) can account for it, I'd rather have this fixed upstream and point users to the new Neovim version.

Replies: 3 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by aorith
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
question Further information is requested mini.pick
2 participants