[tarunnjoshi]

Related to coloredcow-admin/goonj-crm#390 (client request, 19 Oct 2026)

What

Intents created from the engagement (JSM) form now answer the permission letter question with No:

Intent	Field	Value
Individual Collection Camp	"Do you require permission letters from Goonj to get permission from authorities for organizing camps?" (Collection_Camp_Intent_Details.Do_you_require_permission_letters_from_Goonj_to_get_permission_f)	No
Individual Dropping Center	"Some volunteers require permission letters from Goonj to get permission from authorities for Dropping Center. Do you need one too?" (Dropping_Centre.Some_volunteers_require_permission_letters_from_Goonj_to_get_per)	No

Two lines in EngagementIntentTransferService. The value is set by option name (No), the same way the institution dropping center already sets its permission letter question.

Checks

• Same field everywhere: both fields and their options (1 = Yes, 2 = No) are identical on local, staging and production. Checked with read-only SELECTs. No configuration is needed on any environment.
• Local, old vs new code, same cases: the only difference in the created intents is the new "No" answer. Every other field is unchanged.
  • New person, Collection Drive → camp: permission letters = No.
  • Inducted volunteer, Provide space → dropping center: permission letters = No.
  • Inducted volunteer, Collection Drive + Provide space → camp No, dropping center No.
• Review forms: both questions are already on "Collection Camp Intent Review" and "Dropping Center Intent Review", so the team sees "No" pre-filled and can still change it.
• Other forms: the public and back-end intent forms don't use this code, so they are untouched.

Deploy

Normal deploy only. No configuration, no new hooks, no cache clear.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: b0f25cb6-3771-487d-bdc5-91e78658499b

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}