Add description to user group table

[eperedo]

📌 References

• Issue: Closes https://app.clickup.com/t/4528615/869a15300 #869a15300

📝 Implementation

• Add new dropdown to settings to select the attribute for group description
• Add description in Group Columns settings
• Include description in the User Groups table

📹 Screenshots/Screen capture

User-Extended_description_attribute.mp4

🔥 Testing

Create an User Group Attribute and then select it in the Group Columns settings section

[bundlemon]

BundleMon

No change in files bundle size

Groups updated (1)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	Build Folder ./**/*	1.47MB (+2.02KB +0.13%)	+20%

Final result: ✅

View report in BundleMon website ➡️

---

Current branch size history | Target branch size history

[anagperal]

thanks @eperedo ! Only a few comments (some non-blocking) and I found this issue: the Description column stays empty until a reload after configuring the attribute, I need to reload the page.

Screencast.from.2026-08-17.11-25-49.webm

[anagperal]

searchFields is passed unconditionally, so the search matches the description even when the admin sets the Description column to disabled. Typing a word that only exists in a hidden description returns rows whose visible name doesn't match, which reads as a bug from the user's side. Maybe searchFields should be derived from the visible columns instead?

Screencast.from.2026-08-17.11-28-20.webm

[anagperal]

@eperedo it seems this is not fixed:

Screencast.from.2026-09-01.09-03-11.webm

[anagperal]

Also this check is failing https://github.com/EyeSeeTea/user-extended/actions/runs/31216941872/job/95357282823?pr=538

The failing check (dependency-track-yarn4) is unrelated to the code in this PR, it's the SCA gate comparing open alert instances against development. You need to merge development into the branch and push, the job should then report 0 introduced.

[anagperal]

thanks @eperedo ! I still see the same behavior: as a super admin with the Description column set to disabled, searching for a word that only exists in a description still returns that group, even though the column is not shown.

[anagperal]

thanks @eperedo !! all ok