-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
simulation.assembly: implement pulls and pin inversion for jumpers #1098
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hcsch
wants to merge
5
commits into
GlasgowEmbedded:main
Choose a base branch
from
hcsch:feat/sim-jumpers-pulls-inversion
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ca0f9ea
simulation.assembly: loosen electrical contention check
hcsch 7cf7a3b
simulation.assembly: implement pulls and pin inversion for jumpers
hcsch dd9d21b
simulation.assembly: merge jumped pin groups
hcsch 0375e52
simulation.assembly: add tests for pull-ups, inversion, jumpers
hcsch b589a3b
simulation.assembly: suppress unused elaboratable warning
hcsch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks to me like the behavior of
SimulationPinis the same when_pull_state = Noneand_pull_state = PullState.Float(aside from reading the property). Consider initializing_pull_statetoPullState.Floatinstead ofNone. I think it would simplify things a little.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My original thought with this was to enable logging a change from unconfigured to a specific state, but I did not end up implementing something like that. I'll initialize with
PullState.Floatas you suggestThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've decided to keep this since I've now actually implemented logging that makes use of this. If you still want to drop the None, I'm fine with that as well.