Skip to content

docs: fix article typo in ARCHITECTURE.md - #2558

Open
nelsondeleonc-source wants to merge 1 commit into
Graphify-Labs:v8from
nelsondeleonc-source:fix/architecture-doc-article-typo
Open

docs: fix article typo in ARCHITECTURE.md#2558
nelsondeleonc-source wants to merge 1 commit into
Graphify-Labs:v8from
nelsondeleonc-source:fix/architecture-doc-article-typo

Conversation

@nelsondeleonc-source

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Fixes a small grammar issue in the "Adding a new language extractor" section: "Add a extract_<lang>..." should be "Add an extract_<lang>..." since the identifier starts with a vowel sound.

Test plan

  • Docs-only change, no functional impact.

"a extract_<lang>" should be "an extract_<lang>" since the identifier starts with a vowel sound.

@graphify-labs graphify-labs Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Graphify reviewed this change.

Looks safe to merge — no coupling regressions and no blocking issues, checked against the code graph (not a self-assessment).


Graphify review — findings

This pull request makes a single-character grammar edit in ARCHITECTURE.md, changing "a extractor" to "an extractor" in the "Adding a new language extractor" section. It is a documentation-only wording fix with no code or behavioral changes.

No blocking issues surfaced.

Analysis details — impact, health, verification

Impact & health

Graphify review

Impact — 9 functions depend on the 9 functions this change touches.

Health — grade A; no new coupling hotspots.

Verification — 9 functions in the blast radius were not formally verified this run (proofs are advisory here).

Gate & verification

graphify gate

PASS — objectively clean (no health regressions, tests not run — proofs not run this pass (advisory)). Grounded, not self-assessed.

Advisory (not blocking):

  • verification_scope: 9 function(s) in the blast radius were not formally verified this run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant