Skip to content

Add nano_v3 vLLM reasoning parser plugin#2673

Open
dpickem wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dpickem/nano-v3-reasoning-parser
Open

Add nano_v3 vLLM reasoning parser plugin#2673
dpickem wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dpickem/nano-v3-reasoning-parser

Conversation

@dpickem
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dpickem dpickem commented Jun 2, 2026

vLLM reasoning-parser plugin for the Nemotron Nano v3 reasoning format, needed when serving Nano v3.5 with --reasoning-parser nano_v3 for reward profiling.

What does this PR do ?

Add a one line overview of what this PR aims to accomplish.

Issues

List issues that this PR closes (syntax):

Usage

  • You can potentially add a usage example below
# Add a code snippet demonstrating how to use this

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

Pre checks:

  • Make sure you read and followed Contributor guidelines
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?
  • Did you run the unit tests and functional tests locally? Visit our Testing Guide for how to run tests
  • Did you add or update any necessary documentation? Visit our Document Development Guide for how to write, build and test the docs.

Additional Information

  • ...

vLLM reasoning-parser plugin for the Nemotron Nano v3 reasoning format, needed
when serving Nano v3.5 with --reasoning-parser nano_v3 for reward profiling.
@dpickem dpickem requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2026 22:19
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@macandro96
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We're adding the ability to support custom parsers and also add nano-v3 reasoning parser here: #2569

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants