Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions source/contributing/how-to-migrate.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
# How to Migrate Documentation - Step-by-Step Process
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

Migrating documentation is often crucial when reorganizing any project. As such, below is a list of instructions and guidelines to aid you when embarking on the migration journey.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this needs a bit of motivation. Something like that there is a lot of good stuff out there. You may find a piece of writing that covers a topic you want documented very nicely. But different projects, repositories, groups of people - for various reasons - put their work under free but different and possibly incompatible licenses, which may preclude using it for our purposes straight away. (Please don't take this verbatim...)


1. **Licensing**
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
1. Familiarize yourself with the licenses governing the documentation you intend to migrate.
2. Verify if the license of the documentation is compatible with this project's current license.
Comment thread
JeremiahSecrist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
3. If the licenses align, proceed with the migration. Otherwise, follow the steps below.
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
4. Identify the file and determine all contributors to the documentation (typically using blame or a co-owners document).
5. Contact all contributors, requesting permission to migrate the document to the new license.
6. Await responses from all recipients and obtain explicit approval from each contributor before proceeding.
7. If agreement from all contributors cannot be obtained, consider alternative solutions to avoid licensing conflicts, such as:
- A full rewrite of the document.
- Rewriting the areas of specific contributors who did not reply or approve.
Comment on lines +9 to +14

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could have that a separate section and link to that from the last instruction of the license assessment.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are there other situations that warrant license consideration outside migration of documentation for this project specifically? Depending on how much this needs to be expanded upon, I can understand moving it to its own document regardless of the prior question. At present, I don't see enough information needed to warrant it. To be clear, I'm not saying no in the stricter sense. More so, I am looking for the scenario that justifies it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. I was just suggesting taking it out of the list and have separate one. But the broader issue of focusing on just the licensing in this PR actually obviates this particular comment.


2. **Documentation Assessment**
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
1. Perform a thorough review of the existing documentation.
2. Assess the scope, relevance, and quality of the documentation in relation to the migration location.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not clear to me what "quality of the documentation in relation to the migration location" means.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This still needs to be addressed

3. Consider factors such as:
- Completeness
- Accuracy
- Organization
- Readability

3. **Version Control and Branching Strategy**
1. Determine the appropriate branch or repository that contains the most up-to-date or relevant information about the project. In some situations, one might migrate the wrong version if the incorrect branch is specified.
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

5. **Validation and Quality Assurance Post Migration**
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
1. Ensure consistency in the format and structure of the migrated documentation.
2. Consider factors like headings, sections, code formatting, tables, and diagrams.
3. Perform a thorough validation and quality assurance process before finalizing the migration.
Comment thread
zmitchell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
4. Review the migrated documentation for accuracy, completeness, and adherence to desired standards.
5. Validate code snippets, links, images, and references included in the migrated content.
6. Conduct usability testing to gather feedback from users and iterate on the documentation based on their input.
Comment thread
JeremiahSecrist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions source/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77,4 +77,5 @@ contributing/how-to-contribute.md
contributing/how-to-get-help.md
contributing/documentation.md
contributing/writing-a-tutorial.md
contributing/how-to-migrate.md
```