feat(openaev): compatibility with new JSON:API format (#317)

[guzmud]

Proposed changes

• Add compatibility with JSON:API format for payloads to the openaev collector

Testing Instructions

1. Try to import with JSON:API formatted payload available in the source repository

Related issues

• Closes feat(payload): support e2e workflow in the OpenAEV payload collector #317

Checklist

• I consider the submitted work as finished
• I tested the code for its functionality
• I wrote test cases for the relevant uses case
• I added/update the relevant documentation (either on github or on notion)
• Where necessary I refactored code to improve the overall quality
• For bug fix -> I implemented a test that covers the bug

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.44554% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.87%. Comparing base (4068464) to head (1744927).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
openaev/openaev/openaev_openaev.py	85.41%	21 Missing ⚠️
...penaev/tests/functional/test_payload_processing.py	96.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #358      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.06%   72.87%   +1.81%     
==========================================
  Files         128      136       +8     
  Lines        6790     7336     +546     
==========================================
+ Hits         4825     5346     +521     
- Misses       1965     1990      +25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[guzmud]

Adding do not merge since the product orientation of the overall feature in unclear in its expectations regarding implementation (same goes for OpenAEV-Platform/payloads#8). PR in standby in order to have groundwork already done.

[guzmud]

Note: changing the tag from bug to feature due to the redefinition of the issue / redefinition of the target (more details in the attached issue #317 )