Skip to content

Handbook: fix dead anchor links and stale travel-budget copy on Culture page#18184

Open
posthog[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
posthog-code/fix-culture-dead-anchors
Open

Handbook: fix dead anchor links and stale travel-budget copy on Culture page#18184
posthog[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
posthog-code/fix-culture-dead-anchors

Conversation

@posthog

@posthog posthog Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changes

Two links on the handbook Culture page pointed at anchors that no longer exist in spending-money.md after that page was restructured, so clicking them loaded the target page but never scrolled to a section:

  • Coworking link #work-space → now #how-it-works (where the coworking/collaboration budget is described)
  • Travel-budget link #budget-for-working-togethersocializing → now #hub-travel-budget

Also refreshed the stale copy: Culture previously promised a "$1,500 quarterly travel budget", but spending-money now states there is no specific travel budget. Reworded to match. Bumped the Paul Graham makersschedule link from http:// to https:// while in there.

Why: A community member reported the two dead anchors on this well-trafficked page — following either link landed readers in the wrong place and showed outdated budget info.

Checklist

  • I've read the docs and/or content style guides.
  • Words are spelled using American English
  • Use relative URLs for internal links
  • I've checked the pages added or changed in the Vercel preview build
  • If I moved a page, I added a redirect in vercel.json

Created with PostHog Code from an inbox report.

…re page

Repoint two links on the Culture page whose target anchors no longer exist in spending-money.md after that page was restructured (#work-space and #budget-for-working-togethersocializing). They now point at #how-it-works and #hub-travel-budget. Also refresh the stale "$1,500 quarterly travel budget" copy to match the current policy (no fixed travel budget) and bump the Paul Graham link to https.

Generated-By: PostHog Code
Task-Id: 6bdc01cb-d833-4a53-ada7-61872c3becdc
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Deploy preview

Status Details Updated (UTC)
🟢 Ready View preview Jul 07, 2026 03:08PM

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bundle report

Total JS (gzip)

6.29 MiB (no change)

Eager graph (static-import closure per entrypoint)

Entrypoint Eager size Budget Modules
app 24.23 MiB (no change) report-only 5516
Largest modules in the app closure
Module Size
css ./node_modules/.pnpm/css-loader@5.2.7_webpack@5.101.3/node_modules/css-loader/dist/cjs.js??ruleSet[1].rules[8].oneOf[1].use[1]!./node_modules/.pnpm/postcss-loader@4.3.0_postcss@8.5.6_webpack@5.101.3/node_modules/postcss-loader/dist/cjs.js??ruleSet[1].rules[8].oneOf[1].use[2]!./src/styles/global.css 707.7 KiB
./src/components/Stickers/Stickers.tsx 696.4 KiB
./.cache/caches/gatsby-plugin-mdx/mdx-scopes-dir/31a094f140f119e73085d847ae81b99b.js + 2 modules 589.4 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/@radix-ui+react-icons@1.3.2_react@18.3.1/node_modules/@radix-ui/react-icons/dist/react-icons.esm.js 481.4 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/@codemirror+view@6.38.2/node_modules/@codemirror/view/dist/index.js 458.1 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/rehype-raw@7.0.0/node_modules/rehype-raw/lib/index.js + 29 modules 395.1 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/@posthog+icons@0.36.6_react-dom@18.3.1_react@18.3.1__react@18.3.1/node_modules/@posthog/icons/dist/posthog-icons.cjs.js 364.8 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/@posthog+icons@0.36.6_react-dom@18.3.1_react@18.3.1__react@18.3.1/node_modules/@posthog/icons/dist/posthog-icons.es.js 354.8 KiB
./src/hooks/useCustomers.tsx + 54 modules 353.9 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/react-markdown@8.0.7_@types+react@16.14.66_react@18.3.1/node_modules/react-markdown/lib/react-markdown.js + 88 modules 351.4 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/cloudinary-core@2.14.0_lodash@4.17.21/node_modules/cloudinary-core/cloudinary-core.js 281.9 KiB
./src/components/ProductComparisonTable/index.tsx + 116 modules 273.3 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/@codesandbox+sandpack-react@2.20.0_react-dom@18.3.1_react@18.3.1__react@18.3.1/node_modules/@codesandbox/sandpack-react/dist/index.mjs 266.6 KiB
./node_modules/.pnpm/d3@7.9.0/node_modules/d3/src/index.js + 208 modules 247.4 KiB
./src/components/Pricing/PricingSlider/Slider.tsx + 87 modules 239.9 KiB

Eager-graph budgets are report-only until a baseline is established. Sizes are gzip of public/**/*.js; eager size is webpack module source bytes.

Clear the three Vale findings on culture.md:
- Add "coworking" to the spelling-exceptions vocabulary (real term used across the repo).
- Replace the spaced hyphen with a spaced en dash in "super simple – small teams".
- Reword "consciously or not" to "whether consciously or not" to clear an OxfordComma false positive.

Generated-By: PostHog Code
Task-Id: 6bdc01cb-d833-4a53-ada7-61872c3becdc
@andyvan-ph andyvan-ph marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2026 14:44
@andyvan-ph andyvan-ph requested a review from gewenyu99 July 7, 2026 14:53
@andyvan-ph

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gewenyu99 just some minor updates to handbook, but touches the linter as well.

@gewenyu99 gewenyu99 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noice

Hiring high-performing and self-sufficient team members means we don't need the typical corporate processes that are designed to slow teams down. Instead, we're organized into [small teams](/handbook/team-structure), which prioritize speed by delegating decision-making autonomy as much as possible.

Our [management approach](/handbook/company/management) is super simple - small teams report to their team leader, and each of the team leaders reports to one of our four execs. We don't want to create a fancy hierarchy of titles, as we believe this can lead, consciously or not, to people feeling less empowered to make changes and step on toes, especially if they are not in a 'senior' role.
Our [management approach](/handbook/company/management) is super simple small teams report to their team leader, and each of the team leaders reports to one of our four execs. We don't want to create a fancy hierarchy of titles, as we believe this can lead, whether consciously or not, to people feeling less empowered to make changes and step on toes, especially if they are not in a 'senior' role.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

four execs

It's more than 4 now right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants