Skip to content

Clean up h/g/p wording - #5341

Open
beckykd wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
bd-hub-groups
Open

Clean up h/g/p wording#5341
beckykd wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
bd-hub-groups

Conversation

@beckykd

@beckykd beckykd commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@beckykd
beckykd marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2026 21:10
@beckykd
beckykd requested a review from a team July 7, 2026 21:10
@qiskit-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

  • @abbycross
  • @beckykd

@beckykd
beckykd requested a review from francabrera July 7, 2026 21:10
abbycross
abbycross previously approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

@abbycross abbycross left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Comment thread docs/guides/considerations-set-up-runtime.mdx Outdated
Eric-Arellano
Eric-Arellano previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2026

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a huge improvement to me. I would have been a lot less confused. Thanks for working on this!

Might need sign-off from Fran

Comment thread docs/guides/considerations-set-up-runtime.mdx Outdated
@francabrera

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Nice cleanup of the h/g/p references! I think the page could go a bit further though — right now some of the "project" → "instance" swaps read a little awkwardly, and the page still frames things around a grouping construct rather than the current account/IAM model.

I put together a suggested rewrite reframing it around accounts, service instances, and IAM (access groups, resource groups, Enterprise accounts):

bd-hub-groups...francabrera:documentation:bd-hub-groups-suggested-rewrite

Happy to open it as a PR against your branch if that's easier to work with.

@beckykd

beckykd commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Happy to open it as a PR against your branch

Oh thanks! I'd appreciate that!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Confusing reference to hub groups?

5 participants