Skip to content

ran gen-api for qiskit-ibm-transpiler v 0.18.0 (latest) - #5429

Draft
eharvey328 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
transpiler-api-update
Draft

ran gen-api for qiskit-ibm-transpiler v 0.18.0 (latest)#5429
eharvey328 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
transpiler-api-update

Conversation

@eharvey328

@eharvey328 eharvey328 commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

see #5430

  • gen-api script processes files differently now. This run the command for qiskit-ibm-transpiler v0.18.0 (latest)

| [`CollectPermutations`](ai-collect-permutations "qiskit_ibm_transpiler.ai.CollectPermutations")(\[...]) | Collects blocks of SWAP circuits as Permutations. |
| | |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| [`AIRouting`](/docs/api/qiskit-ibm-transpiler/ai-ai-routing "qiskit_ibm_transpiler.ai.AIRouting")(\[coupling\_map, backend, ...]) | The AIRouting pass acts both as a layout stage and a routing stage. |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤔 why the change from relative to absolute links?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was a change introduced during the addons pipeline to resolve cross-package links. It does this by passing allObjectInvs. When a link matches it's own package's object.inv, they get rewritten to absolute paths by resolveStubUrl.

The relative-to-absolute change is intentional behavior from that pipeline refactor, and both formats work (normalizeUrl handled paths that starts with /docs/api). So functionally it's fine, it's just a side effect of now resolving cross-package links through object.inv.

@eharvey328
eharvey328 marked this pull request as draft July 28, 2026 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants