Use the shared downstream workflow on Julia 1 - #4323
Merged
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit intoAug 24, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
ChrisRackauckas-Claude
force-pushed
the
ci/use-shared-downstream
branch
from
August 20, 2026 21:54
080c99b to
c1dd797
Compare
Member
Author
|
The first complete execution of the shared workflow expanded successfully and produced 128 completed checks. For the external downstream matrix, all ModelingToolkit groups, DiffEqCallbacks, and SciMLSensitivity Core1–Core5 passed on Julia 1.12. The two red downstream jobs are independent test failures rather than workflow/resolver failures:
Representative shared-workflow run: https://github.com/SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/actions/runs/32396885075 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Use SciML's shared downstream workflow on the current Julia 1 release and develop both the OrdinaryDiffEq root project and every immediate
lib/*project. This replaces the repository-specific Julia 1.10 runner, whose resolver now fails before ProbNumDiffEq's tests start.The reusable workflow is pinned to the merge commit from SciML/.github#128 because the moving
v1tag has not yet been released withupstream-subdirsglob support.Please ignore this PR until it has been reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.
Regression evidence
Before, the downstream job's Julia 1.10 environment failed during resolution, before running ProbNumDiffEq tests:
After switching the same downstream package to Julia 1.12.7 and developing
.plus alllib/*projects, I ran the complete downstream test command:Verification
I did not run the other eleven downstream repositories locally; the workflow matrix will exercise them. This workflow-only change does not touch docs, public API, or GPU code.
Supersedes the repository-local approach in #4320.