Test engineer plugin current coverage - #152
Conversation
Plugin Validation Summary — PR #152Verdict: ❌ FAIL — 3 critical marketplace inconsistencies must be fixed before merge. What this PR doesPR #152 is primarily a revert/removal PR plus one new plugin:
Because the deletions are complete at the file level, the plugin-validator/skill-reviewer agents correctly reported the deleted The real defects are all in 🔴 Critical (errors — must fix)All three live in C1 — Dangling
|
theMickster
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few things to change, all feel minor other that how we approach Tech Breakdowns. Great start @nthompson-bitwarden!
SaintPatrck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great start! In addition to the inline comments, I think it would be beneficial for everyone if we go ahead and introduce trigger evals, at a minimum, so we can objectively measure effectiveness of these additions and future changes. #126 is an example of basic evals for a design based skill. The creating-pull-requests skill in delivery-tools plugin also has some basic evals you can use as a reference. Happy to sync up outside of this PR and talk through setting them up using /skill-creator if you'd like.
🤖 Bitwarden Claude Code ReviewOverall Assessment: APPROVE This PR adds a new Code Review DetailsNo blocking findings. Validation notes (all cleared, no action needed):
Note: existing reviewer threads are still being actively addressed by the author; this automated pass adds no new inline comments. |
|
@nthompson-bitwarden Looks like ya got a quick merge conflict to resolve |
|
That merge did not go well. 😆 |
working on it, the pnpm check left me standed (but did it's job!) 😮💨 |
4f37982 to
e275d10
Compare
🎟️ Tracking
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/QA-1983
📔 Objective
Slimmed down version of #150 containing only files necessary to get a "current test coverage" report