creating qa skill based on retro feedback#162
Conversation
Plugin Validation Summary — PR #162Scope: New skill Files reviewed:
Overall: ❌ Request changes — one blocking policy violation. The skill itself is structurally sound, secure, and high quality; the PR is missing the mandatory version bump and changelog entry. 🔴 Critical (must fix)1. Missing mandatory version bump + changelog entry for a substantive change
Adding a backward-compatible feature is a MINOR bump: Remediation: echo "y" | ./scripts/bump-plugin-version.sh bitwarden-atlassian-tools 2.3.0(updates
After bumping, re-run 🟠 Major (should fix)2. Skill description is over-length — Remediation: Trim to trigger phrases + one-line purpose + proactive clause (~500 chars); drop the criterion enumeration, which is already in the body. 🟡 Minor (optional)3. Occasional second-person phrasing in Step 2 — 4. Criteria summary duplicates the reference — ✅ Passing checksPlugin structure (plugin-validator)
Skill quality (skill-reviewer)
Security (reviewing-claude-config)
Bottom lineThe new skill is well-designed, secure, and ready on its own merits. Blocking issue: add the |
🎟️ Tracking
AI-27
📔 Objective