Skip to content

Align EDOT docs wording for Managed OTLP targets and crash reporting support - #620

Draft
theletterf with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-docs-compatibility-issue
Draft

Align EDOT docs wording for Managed OTLP targets and crash reporting support#620
theletterf with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-docs-compatibility-issue

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This addresses the repo-local coherence findings in the docs sweep by removing wording that implied EDOT Cloud Forwarder targets only Serverless and by tightening the crash reporting description to match the EDOT SDK support matrix.

  • Managed OTLP target wording

    • Updated the EDOT Cloud Forwarder overview to describe the Managed OTLP endpoint as an Elastic Cloud target, which matches both the page’s applies_to metadata and the mOTLP reference docs.
  • Crash reporting support wording

    • Narrowed the EDOT-vs-upstream comparison table entry from generic “mobile platforms” wording to supported platforms, explicitly noting current iOS-only support.
  • Scope

    • The APM Server destination contradiction called out in the sweep points to a page in the separate docs-content repo; this PR only resolves the findings that are editable in elastic/opentelemetry.
-{{edot-cf}} sends the data it collects directly to the ... endpoint of {{serverless-full}}.
+{{edot-cf}} sends the data it collects directly to the ... endpoint of {{ecloud}}.

-| Crash reporting | Available in EDOT only. Captures native crash data on mobile platforms for post-mortem analysis. |
+| Crash reporting | Available in EDOT only. Captures native crash data on supported mobile platforms (currently iOS only) for post-mortem analysis. |

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix contradictory content in APM Server documentation Align EDOT docs wording for Managed OTLP targets and crash reporting support Jun 19, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from theletterf June 19, 2026 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants