Skip to content

Add Repositories GUI client screenshots#2138

Open
andeha wants to merge 3 commits into
git:gh-pagesfrom
andeha:add-repositories-gui
Open

Add Repositories GUI client screenshots#2138
andeha wants to merge 3 commits into
git:gh-pagesfrom
andeha:add-repositories-gui

Conversation

@andeha
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@andeha andeha commented Feb 23, 2026

Changes

Add Repositories — a native macOS Git client
Repositories is a Git client for macOS featuring a visual commit graph, hunk and line-level staging, cherry-pick and squash operations, blame view, Quick Look file preview, and GitHub integration. Built for macOS 13+ with full dark mode support.

Context

Repositories is a native macOS Git client that has been in active development and is now ready to be listed among the GUI clients on git-scm.com. This PR adds the required metadata file and screenshots.

@dscho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

dscho commented May 21, 2026

A few things I'd like to clarify before this can move forward.

The PR description says "Built for macOS 13+" but the live website currently says "macOS 26 (Tahoe) or later". Those two claims contradict each other, and the answer matters a lot -- macOS 26 is not even released yet, which would severely limit who can actually use this today.

The app is distributed as a direct DMG download, not through the Mac App Store. I noticed that Streck.ai's other product (Turbine) explicitly advertises being signed and notarized, but the Repositories page makes no such claim. For a proprietary app that handles Git credentials and GitHub PATs, it would be good to know whether it is signed and notarized.

The name "Repositories" is also problematic for the trend_name field. It is an extremely generic English word, so trend_name: "Repositories" will produce completely meaningless Google Trends data -- it will just reflect people searching for the word "repositories" in general, not for this app.

I could not find any reviews, discussions, or third-party mentions of this app anywhere online. The developer background looks fine (established GitHub account, real company with multiple shipped products), so this is not a legitimacy question per se. But some evidence of independent traction would help justify the listing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants