Skip to content

Add Bitwarden Secrets Manager provider#2011

Open
kvncrw wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
kvncrw:add-bitwarden-provider
Open

Add Bitwarden Secrets Manager provider#2011
kvncrw wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
kvncrw:add-bitwarden-provider

Conversation

@kvncrw
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kvncrw kvncrw commented Mar 16, 2026

Summary

This PR adds the Bitwarden Secrets Manager CSI Provider to the list of supported providers.

The provider implements the v1alpha1 gRPC provider protocol and enables Kubernetes workloads to mount secrets from Bitwarden Secrets Manager via the Secrets Store CSI Driver.

Provider details

Changes in this PR

  • docs/book/src/introduction.md — Added Bitwarden Provider link to the Supported Providers list
  • docs/book/src/providers.md — Added Bitwarden column to the feature comparison table

Note

e2e tests for the Bitwarden provider will be added in a follow-up PR.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kvncrw
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ritazh for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from aramase and ritazh March 16, 2026 01:09
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 16, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If secrets-store-csi-driver contributors determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @kvncrw. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 16, 2026
@enj enj added this to SIG Auth Mar 16, 2026
@enj enj moved this to Subprojects - Needs Triage in SIG Auth Mar 16, 2026
@enj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

enj commented Mar 19, 2026

Neat, @aramase I think there is some e2e requirements we have for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants