Support for the stm32 platform#2185
Conversation
stm32 platform
|
@erlingrj and @tanneberger: it seems to me that a better place to implement this would be in |
erlingrj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks promising @naichenzhao!
On a higher level. I worry that we will just pile on code and complexity for each target we want to support. It would be a huge improvement if STM32/Pico/Zephyr/++ support could be captured in a single CMake file that is not code-generated but just embedded in the JAR. @petervdonovan discuss this a little her: #2154.
I think we can merge in the STM32 stuff. But after this we should think a little about how we can make this scale better.
|
@naichenzhao, do you think you'll find an opportunity to work on this anytime soon? This efforts needs to be revived... |
|
This PR depends on #2432 to be merged first. |
Subsumes #2103.
reactor-c: lf-lang/reactor-c#302
template: lf-lang/stm32-nucleo-f446re-template#1