Skip to content

Clarify ULAN predicate in unmodeled relationship example - #807

Open
sundog358 wants to merge 1 commit into
linked-art:v1.1from
sundog358:docs/ulan-unmodeled-relationship
Open

Clarify ULAN predicate in unmodeled relationship example#807
sundog358 wants to merge 1 commit into
linked-art:v1.1from
sundog358:docs/ulan-unmodeled-relationship

Conversation

@sundog358

@sundog358 sundog358 commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

The existing unmodeled-relationship example describes Ferdinand Bol as a student of Rembrandt and recommends assigned_property when an appropriate predicate is known, but the generated example currently supplies only the display name.

This adds Getty's existing ulan1102_student_of predicate to that example. The direction matches the record: Ferdinand Bol is the subject carrying attributed_by, student of is the predicate, and Rembrandt is the assigned object. The full URI avoids requiring an additional compact-prefix declaration.

This is a narrow clarification of the existing pattern, not a proposal to add GVP properties to the Linked Art context.

Implementation evidence

Sun & Rain Works tested the same shape in Meta Museum using the canonical Linked Art context and its local Linked Art profile inspector. The public, self-contained fixture, verification evidence, and boundary notes are published here:

https://gist.github.com/sundog358/fe4602275bfff23eaf9503b6e597ca5a

Verification

  • Clean checkout of v1.1 at fded7e715dcbe7642b6658151a616153dacf84a0
  • Upstream dependencies installed in an isolated virtual environment
  • python -m mkdocs build --clean passed
  • Generated JSON-LD, HTML, and graph retain the full predicate URI
  • Meta Museum focused conformance and documentation suite: 71 tests passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant