Skip to content

update parity docs workflow#637

Open
alexrashed wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
eng-877-update-docs-parity-updatesyml-script-to-generate-localstack
Open

update parity docs workflow#637
alexrashed wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
eng-877-update-docs-parity-updatesyml-script-to-generate-localstack

Conversation

@alexrashed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@alexrashed alexrashed commented May 8, 2026

Motivation

We have recently restructured some of our code and workflows, which broke our pipeline to collect parity metrics.
This PR tries to fix the pipeline again such that the PRs updating the parity data are created again.

Changes

  • Revive the parity metrics pipeline.

Testing

The workflow has been tested from this branch and produced this PR: #649

@alexrashed alexrashed force-pushed the eng-877-update-docs-parity-updatesyml-script-to-generate-localstack branch from 0062b75 to 418dec6 Compare May 12, 2026 13:50
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cloudflare-workers-and-pages Bot commented May 12, 2026

Deploying localstack-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: f5856e1
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://9d0da51d.localstack-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://eng-877-update-docs-parity-u.localstack-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@alexrashed alexrashed force-pushed the eng-877-update-docs-parity-updatesyml-script-to-generate-localstack branch from 418dec6 to 8219404 Compare May 12, 2026 13:51
alexrashed and others added 2 commits May 13, 2026 10:17
The acceptance test artifact has no numeric shard suffix unlike integration
tests, so the trailing `-*` glob never matched anything.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The step consumed iac-catalog-assets to feed create_cfn_coverage_table.py,
but both the script and the artifact were removed in earlier commits.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@alexrashed alexrashed marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2026 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants