Skip to content

Add support for multi-subrequest forking - #7

Open
addykan wants to merge 1 commit into
richard/lossy-subrequestfrom
adhvik/subrequest/multi-subrequest
Open

Add support for multi-subrequest forking#7
addykan wants to merge 1 commit into
richard/lossy-subrequestfrom
adhvik/subrequest/multi-subrequest

Conversation

@addykan

@addykan addykan commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@addykan
addykan requested review from gongy and molocule August 10, 2026 19:31
&mut self,
max_chunks: usize,
forks: usize,
mapper: F,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit, but could mapper be named to reflect that it just reserves memory

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the mapper is abstract inside this module - the concept of memory reservations only exists in fprs. I guess it's fine to rename given it's only us using it, but imo that bleeds the abstraction across two separate crates?

@addykan
addykan requested a review from molocule August 11, 2026 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants