Repository navigation
docs: reconcile LocalAI manual integration status - #3818
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Distinguish verified manual integration from closed PR merge metadata. Signed-off-by: LauraGPT <zhifu.gzf@alibaba-inc.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Correct the stale pending-review entry for LocalAI #10090. The upstream owner
manually squash-integrated it on September11 as
df70ff31.
The PR itself is closed with
mergedAt=null; this change keeps those factsdistinct and links the integration note and exact current backend/importer files.
Only one documentation table row changes. No runtime, dependency or CI change.
Evidence And Validation
current master's backend-file history. All 33 inspected source blobs across
original/accepted/current refs match their Git OID and byte size.
LocalAI runtime, GPU, pretrained-ASR, release or adoption result is claimed.
previously recorded offline hub/model failures are not a passing full suite.
merge. Existing main protection settings are unchanged.