-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 975
feat: Explicitly define include/exclude attributes for views #4951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
thompson-tomo
wants to merge
6
commits into
open-telemetry:main
Choose a base branch
from
thompson-tomo:Exclude_Attributes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+33
−9
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b495be
feat: Explicitly define exclude attributes for metrics
thompson-tomo 184fd74
Update CHANGELOG.md
thompson-tomo 8b6eec7
Update api.md
thompson-tomo 5c644e7
Update sdk.md
thompson-tomo e0f4d2b
Review feedback
thompson-tomo 41a21fc
Update sdk.md
thompson-tomo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
don't need this in the API/advisory. if something should not be used, then instrumentation can not provide it at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't opt-in/deprecated attributes reside in this advisory? That way if stream config doesn't specify included/excluded attributes the advisory can be used to exclude them with 0 zero config.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opt-in attributes are not emitted by instrumentation (because SDK respects it) by default — they only appear when the user explicitly opts in via Views. So there's nothing to exclude in the zero-config case.
For exclude_attributes, the instrumentation library itself should stop emitting them (or the semantic conventions should guide the migration). The fix belongs at the instrumentation layer, not as an SDK-side exclude hint.
The existing Attributes (include) advisory already covers the zero-config story: the instrumentation author lists the recommended attribute keys, and anything not on that list is implicitly not recommended.