Skip to content

Add Prometheus interoperability to codeowners #5027

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ArthurSens wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+4 −0
Open

Add Prometheus interoperability to codeowners #5027

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions .github/CODEOWNERS
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,3 +14,7 @@

# Global owners, will be the owners for everything in the repo. Membership is tracked via https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/community-members.md
* @open-telemetry/technical-committee @open-telemetry/spec-sponsors

# Prometheus-specific specifications
/specification/compatibility/prometheus_and_openmetrics.md @open-telemetry/technical-committee @open-telemetry/spec-sponsors @open-telemetry/prometheus-interoperability
Comment thread
jack-berg marked this conversation as resolved.
/specification/metrics/sdk_exporters/prometheus.md @open-telemetry/technical-committee @open-telemetry/spec-sponsors @open-telemetry/prometheus-interoperability
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jack-berg jack-berg Apr 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't just notify the group, it adds the group as official approvers who's approval counters towards the merge requirements for PRs.

I think this is a good idea, but first, should do some housekeeping and make sure the team membership reflects people actively involved in the interoperability effort, as @dashpole suggests: #5027 (comment)

Loading