8383769: compiler/c2/TestDependsOnTestSqrtHFAssertion.java timed out#31072
8383769: compiler/c2/TestDependsOnTestSqrtHFAssertion.java timed out#31072anton-seoane wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back aseoane! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@anton-seoane This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 71 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@vnkozlov, @merykitty, @jatin-bhateja) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
@anton-seoane The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
The total number of required reviews for this PR has been set to 2 based on the presence of this label: |
|
Pinging @jatin-bhateja, as he was the one who originally introduced the test |
Webrevs
|
merykitty
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. This test runs the main loop for 100_000 iterations, maybe this can be lowered, too?
|
@merykitty yes, originally I thought of bounding |
Change looks good to me. |
|
@anton-seoane I think that is fine, currently, the inner loop runs for 5 billion iterations, which is unnecessarily large. If you lower that number, I think you can even skip the |
…e coverage, fix misaligned brace
|
I've now reduced the number of iterations, and added |
merykitty
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me, thanks for making the changes.
|
@vnkozlov although it looks like a yes, unfortunately we don't have the resources (i.e. |
This PR limits the execution of a occasionally timing out test to the platform context in which it only makes sense to run it.
The regression test for JDK-8378897 has been found occasionally to be timing out (most recently in the Valhalla CI). This test only makes sense in the context of AVX512-FP16-enabled x86 CPUs, and should therefore only be executed when such features are available.
Testing: test is now skipped if the CPU does not support AVX512-FP16
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/31072/head:pull/31072$ git checkout pull/31072Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/31072$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/31072/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 31072View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 31072Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31072.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment