-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
Create 2026 Q2 TAC Report for Global Cyber Policy WG #618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 2 commits
9d33481
eefbb92
8e1209e
cc78d0b
4c79cd4
1f7289f
c034203
37f19e8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ | ||
| # 2026 Q2 TAC Report for Global Cyber Policy Working Group | ||
|
|
||
| ## Overview | ||
|
|
||
| * GitHub repo: https://github.com/ossf/wg-globalcyberpolicy/ | ||
| * Minutes doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iAplSQheMgemdMnEw74uPj3oi_6rLLbFFXhg4svqIDo/edit | ||
| * Charter: https://github.com/ossf/wg-globalcyberpolicy/blob/main/CHARTER.md | ||
|
|
||
| This has been running since January 2025, after the Linux Foundation workshop on "Stewards and Manufacturers" in Amsterdam in December 2024. The scope of the group is to provide a forum for our members and the broader community to collaborate on Global Cybersecurity-related legislation, frameworks, and standards which facilitate conformance to regulatory requirements by open source projects and their consumers. We have been holding bi-weekly calls. We have 2 active SIGs - Awareness and Standards. The group is focusing most of its attention on the European Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) with some time put aside to monitor activities in other jurisdictions. We also have drafted a [liaisons list](https://github.com/ossf/wg-globalcyberpolicy/blob/main/governance/external-liaisons.md) which is a list of external organizations we feel we need to liaise with, with a special emphasis on the [Eclipse ORC working group](https://github.com/orcwg/), to minimize overlap. | ||
|
|
||
| Recenty at Open Source Summit North America, the group ran a "hybrid" f2f meeting ... | ||
|
torgo marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
|
|
||
| We were greatly honored that the OpenSSF team saw fit to create a physical version of a "CRA-Fish" mascot. ... | ||
|
|
||
| We have two working group co-leads: [Daniel Appelquist | Samsung](https://github.com/torgo) and [Roman Zhukov | Red Hat](https://github.com/rozhukov). [Megan Knight | Arm](https://github.com/businesscasualkesha) chairs the Awareness SIG and [Madalin Neag](https://github.com/madalinnneag) from OpenSSF staff chairs the Standards SIG. In addition, we have support from [Jeff Diecks](https://github.com/GeauxJD), [Crob](https://github.com/SecurityCRob) and [David A. Wheeler](https://github.com/david-a-wheeler). | ||
|
|
||
| We also operate the "EU CRA Monthly Tech Talk". | ||
|
|
||
| We have a regular schedule of calls for our Awareness and Standards SIGs and take minutes in the following minutes docs: | ||
| * Main WG/Awareness SIG: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iAplSQheMgemdMnEw74uPj3oi_6rLLbFFXhg4svqIDo/edit?tab=t.0 | ||
| * Standards SIG: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XjE5VYdyIdH32T94ZQIj0Hf5btRiKG58z3jSInY77wA/edit?tab=t.0 | ||
|
|
||
| This quarter, we have continued to work with the [ORBIT Launchpad](https://github.com/ossf/orbit-launchpad) effort. As noted in their charter, Cyber Policy working group is a key stakeholder and partner for ORBIT Launchpad. This work has subsumed the work that we initially conceived of as a "Tooling" SIG in our own working group. | ||
|
|
||
| Our general working group call, besides being a place where SIGs report, also serves as a venue to work on general deliverables and to drive awareness with group members of related activities. | ||
|
|
||
| Since our last report | ||
|
|
||
|
torgo marked this conversation as resolved.
|
||
| [all needs an edit] | ||
|
|
||
| * we held xx tech talks: | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. need something here There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think Roman already mentioned the one from April the upcoming one
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @torgo yes, Madalin is correct, I just roll everything up into bullet points (Line 29-35) ^^. |
||
|
|
||
| * Something about maintainers guidelines | ||
|
|
||
| * We have sent out numerous updates on activities in relevant standards organizations, and produced a [CRA Standards Map](https://policy.openssf.org/CRA/standards.html). | ||
|
|
||
| * We have produced xx [blog posts](https://openssf.org/category/policy/cra/) . | ||
|
|
||
| ## Awareness SIG | ||
|
|
||
| The awareness SIG is led by [Megan Knight](https://github.com/businesscasualkesha) of Arm. The scope is activities that drive awareness of the work of this group and of the regulatory landscape in general. The SIG has been marshalling blog posts and the upcoming conference schedule. The Awareness SIG minutes are kept in the [main working group minutes document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iAplSQheMgemdMnEw74uPj3oi_6rLLbFFXhg4svqIDo/edit). | ||
|
|
||
| Activities and Publications: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I propose to delete this Activities and Publications section. I think we captured all relevant updates above. I've scanned Notes doc and didn't find anything to add...
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @torgo propose to DELETE Lines 51-54. Because we're mentioning key outcomes in the bullet points up there ^^ |
||
| * xx | ||
|
|
||
| ## Standards SIG | ||
|
|
||
| The Standards SIG is led by [Madalin Neag](https://github.com/madalinnneag). | ||
|
|
||
| [this all needs an edit] | ||
|
torgo marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
|
|
||
| The mission of the Standardization SIG has been to coordinate stakeholder engagement on cybersecurity standards related to policy, with a focus on raising awareness of standards development activities connected to the CRA. The SIG has also monitored complementary standards initiatives and policy developments to ensure members maintain visibility into the evolving regulatory and standardization landscape. | ||
|
|
||
| The group has supported the involvement of OpenSSF members and staff in standards activities by serving as a coordination forum to guide engagement strategies across European Standards Organizations (ESOs) and other SDOs, particularly where confidentiality practices differ from those typically used in open source communities. Through this coordination, OpenSSF representatives have enabled participation by sharing knowledge and updates, advocating for open source values, and coordinating community-level feedback on key deliverables, including the [CEN](https://www.cencenelec.eu/about-cen/) horizontal standards (such as PT1 and PT3 - see [standards map](https://policy.openssf.org/CRA/standards.html) for detail). | ||
|
|
||
| A core component of the SIG’s work has been facilitating community’s participation in public consultations related to cybersecurity standards and policy. The group has raised awareness of consultation opportunities, shared relevant information, and coordinated the consolidation of feedback so that responses reflect the collective expertise of the OpenSSF community. | ||
|
|
||
| The SIG has also acted as an information-sharing platform on related policy developments, standards initiatives, funding opportunities, and key steps for CRA implementation, including updates on delegated and implementing acts, guidance materials, roadmaps, and developments from relevant European institutions and authorities. | ||
|
|
||
| The SIG's mission has been to coordinate between stakeholders regarding engagement in Standards work related to cybersecurity policy. This is complicated by the fact that many of these standards organizations have a different approach to confidentiality than the OpenSSF. The discussions of this group have helped to guide the engagement of OpenSSF staff within some of these efforts. | ||
|
|
||
| The SIG's main work this year has been on raising awareness of relevant standards efforts, disseminating information to members about these efforts, and highligting when public consultations are open / helping members participate in these consultations. | ||
|
|
||
| The SIG's main work this year has been on raising awareness of relevant standards efforts, disseminating information to members about these efforts, and highligting when public consultations are open / helping members participate in these consultations. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. there is a duplication between lines 60 and 62
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added already to my comment ^^ @torgo |
||
|
|
||
| We are developing [Comments to the draft Communication on Commission guidance on the application of the CRA](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UNVJ5o3snT1oV_bqLWSmlBYm1DCvysQJcwvBszPjzes/edit) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. line 64 needs to be removed
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added already to my comment ^^ @torgo |
||
| Minutes available here: [SIG Minutes Document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XjE5VYdyIdH32T94ZQIj0Hf5btRiKG58z3jSInY77wA/view?tab=t.0). | ||
|
|
||
| ## Questions/Issues for the TAC | ||
|
|
||
| None at this time. | ||
|
torgo marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Additional Information | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.