Repository navigation
[executorch][native-ggml] Size the scheduler hash for graph leafs too - #24991
Merged
Merged
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/24991
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ⏳ No Failures, 1 PendingAs of commit 344b1b6 with merge base ce0d880 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
SS-JIA
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2026
SS-JIA
force-pushed
the
gh/SS-JIA/703/orig
branch
from
November 12, 2026 21:44
bae44b4 to
53218c4
Compare
This PR needs a
|
## Ulterior Motive Running Gemma 4 31B through ExecuTorch Native's GGML engine on CUDA, to find why it decodes slower than llama.cpp on the same GGUF. ## Rationale **What**: The backend scheduler is created for `2 * graph_size` tensors. **Why**: `ggml_backend_sched` hashes every node and every leaf of a graph it splits, and asserts that its hash set holds them all. It was sized for `graph_size`, which caps nodes and leafs separately, so a graph whose nodes and leafs together outgrew it failed that assertion, though either count alone fit. ## Details - **Before**: `ggml_backend_sched_new(..., graph_size, ...)`; ggml's own source notes the hash "needs to be size*2 to account for leafs". - **After**: `2 * graph_size`, room for a full graph of `graph_size` nodes and `graph_size` leafs. `test_graph_with_as_many_leafs_as_nodes` adds 2,100 separate constants to an input: 2,100 nodes and as many leafs, within the default graph size of 4,096. Authored with Claude Code. Differential Revision: [D130721991](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D130721991/) ghstack-source-id: 469829014 Pull-Request: #24847
SS-JIA
force-pushed
the
gh/SS-JIA/703/orig
branch
from
November 12, 2026 21:45
53218c4 to
344b1b6
Compare
This branch was previously deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #24847 by @SS-JIA
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/703/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/703/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/702/orig
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/703/orig
Differential Revision: D130721991
@diff-train-skip-merge