Add a few operators to binrat (refinement of rat by bigQ)

[proux01]

No description provided.

[proux01]

CI green, @CohenCyril would you allow me to merge this, do a release and the OPAM package or would you prefer to have a look first / do it yourself?

[CohenCyril]

@proux01 sure, you can go ahead.

• I would be in favour of a transition to a meta.yml generated meta data.
• You might want to give a try to Initial introduction of a opam-release tool templates#91

[proux01]

• I would be in favour of a transition to a meta.yml generated meta data.

good point, done

• You might want to give a try to coq-community/templates#91

I'll be happy to try it once the required release of multinomials will have happened : math-comp/multinomials#38

[proux01]

• You might want to give a try to coq-community/templates#91

So I just tried it, it's nice, a few minor comments:

• I had to update from OPAM 2.0.3 to 2.0.5, an opam version check would be great, but definitely a detail
• I had to git config --add github.user <user> otherwise the call to git config makes the whole script fail (on line 59, without error message, whatever the options provided)
• I would love an option to use an already existing clone of coq-opam-archive, the clone takes both bandwidth and time

[CohenCyril]

Thank you very much for trying. Could you tell me what failed with opam 2.0.3?

[proux01]

The lint option check-upstream did not exist (it may exist in 2.0.4, haven't tried).

[CohenCyril]

• I would love an option to use an already existing clone of coq-opam-archive, the clone takes both bandwidth and time

I will definitely provide this option. Note that you can also use --depth n (start with n=1 and increase if it does not work) to do a shallow clone (it may fail because sometimes pushes of branches from clones that are too shallow are rejected by github)