Skip to content

Correct the format of Regional Endpoints in the list of Regions#4554

Open
lukeknep wants to merge 14 commits into
mainfrom
fix-regional-endpoints
Open

Correct the format of Regional Endpoints in the list of Regions#4554
lukeknep wants to merge 14 commits into
mainfrom
fix-regional-endpoints

Conversation

@lukeknep
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lukeknep lukeknep commented May 12, 2026

What does this PR do?

  • We have two types of endpoints.
  • A long time ago, we moved Regional Endpoints to a new format ending in api.temporal.io, which is already reflected in our UI / API / CLI.
  • Some docs pages were left on the old format (ending in tmprl.cloud), including the list of Regions & their regional endpoints. While these still "work" today, they are subject to change without notice and should not be used in Users' code.
  • This PR fixes the outdated format of all instances of ...region.tmprl.cloud in the docs.

Notes to Reviewers

  • I have validated programmatically that every single Regional Endpoint listed actually connects successfully.
  • I have searched and removed all instances of the old format, except under the AWS PrivateLink for High Availability section (which was not actually talking about a Regional Endpoint, but did happen to use the old format). This will need an additional PR along with some internal alignment on Product direction.

┆Attachments: EDU-6342 Correct the format of Regional Endpoints in the list of Regions

@lukeknep lukeknep requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2026 21:26
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 12, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
temporal-documentation Error Error May 17, 2026 6:03pm

Request Review

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 12, 2026

📖 Docs PR preview links

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@daniel-goldstein daniel-goldstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks mostly good but I don't think we can actually change the HA sections since we still use the old endpoint in CNAMEs

Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/get-started/namespaces.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/high-availability/failovers.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/high-availability/ha-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread static/json/privatelink_services_aws.json Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/get-started/namespaces.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/high-availability/failovers.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/high-availability/failovers.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/high-availability/ha-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/high-availability/ha-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread static/json/privatelink_services_aws.json Outdated
Comment thread static/json/privatelink_services_aws.json Outdated
Co-authored-by: Luke Knepper <lukeknepper@gmail.com>
Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/get-started/namespaces.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/cloud/connectivity/aws-connectivity.mdx Outdated
lukeknep and others added 6 commits May 15, 2026 13:33
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lenny Chen <55669665+lennessyy@users.noreply.github.com>
@lukeknep
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok @daniel-goldstein I've resolved all of the issues you pointed out, great catches!

For HA Namespaces, we have GA'd the automatic failover of Namespace Endpoints via DNS + GA'd PrivateLink where we told the customer to take a dependency on this behavior. This is the only place where they can take a dependency on DNS resolution, so I've added this to the docs:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants