-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
fix(sdk): fail fast when agent messaging has no encryption #260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
sanil-23
merged 2 commits into
tinyhumansai:main
from
sanil-23:fix/agent-send-requires-encryption
Jul 15, 2026
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Extract the guard and add async error handling.
sendMessagenow exceeds the 20-line limit, and its asynchronous directory/transport operations still lack atry/catch. Extract the encryption assertion or envelope construction into helpers, then catch failures while preserving the original error/cause.As per coding guidelines, async functions must use try-catch blocks and functions are limited to 20 lines.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Source: Coding guidelines
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed the quick win: extracted the encryption assertion into
assertEncryptionEnabled()in 1561dc6, sosendMessageis back to a focused ~14-line body.Declined the paired try/catch: no function in this module (
resolveRecipientKey,publishKeys,readMessages) wraps its async directory/transport calls — the established idiom here is to let errors propagate to the caller with their original stack/cause intact. A re-throw wrapper would be inconsistent noise and could obscure the cause rather than preserve it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sanil-23Thanks for the update — extractingassertEncryptionEnabled()bringssendMessageback under the line limit while keeping the guard clearly named and documented.Your reasoning on the try/catch is fair: since
resolveRecipientKey,publishKeys, andreadMessagesall let async errors propagate untouched, adding a catch-and-rethrow just insendMessagewould be inconsistent with the module's existing convention and risks flattening the original stack/cause for no real benefit. I won't push further on that point.✏️ Learnings added