Skip to content

Update did:ma url to version 1.0.0 final - #745

Open
bahner wants to merge 1 commit into
w3c:mainfrom
bahner:main
Open

Update did:ma url to version 1.0.0 final#745
bahner wants to merge 1 commit into
w3c:mainfrom
bahner:main

Conversation

@bahner

@bahner bahner commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request is just to update the method with a proper version tag for v1.0.0 instead of an rc1 tag.

Since the rc1 the updatedAt field has been changed from timestamps with subsecond granularity to seconds.
It makes no sense to update at DID Document more often than that since propagating won't even have time to happen.

Just a final ounce of complexity squeezed from the method. This makes version 1 final

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 AI Preliminary Specification Review

This is an advisory, automated review of the DID Method specification(s) referenced in this pull request, checked against the registration checklist. It does not replace review by the registry editors.

All reviewed submissions passed the preliminary checklist review. A registry editor will still perform the final review.

methods/ma.json — method did:ma

Specification: https://github.com/bahner/ma-spec/blob/v1.0.0/did-ma-spec-v1.md

Preliminary verdict: ✅ PASS

The did:ma specification is a genuine, well-structured DID Method spec with defined syntax, full CRUD operations, and substantive security and privacy sections. All MUST criteria are satisfied.

Item Level Status Notes
M1. Specification is reachable and is a DID Method specification MUST pass
M2. DID Method Syntax is defined MUST pass
M3. CRUD operations are defined MUST pass
M4. Security Considerations section is present and substantive MUST pass
M5. Privacy Considerations section is present and substantive MUST pass
M6. Method name is indicative and non-generic MUST pass
M7. No unreasonable legal, security, moral, or privacy harms MUST pass
M8. Human-readable description of the addition MUST pass
S1. contactEmail present OPTIONAL pass
S2. verifiableDataRegistry present OPTIONAL pass
⚠️ S3. Intellectual-property posture is clear SHOULD warn No explicit IP/copyright/licensing statement is visible in the fetched (truncated) text; absence is a warning, not a failure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants