refactor(memory): finish TinyCortex consolidation - #5140
Conversation
…ration-2026-07-22 # Conflicts: # vendor/tinyflows
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 13 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (103)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e394d1c901
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0b52ad7f1a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Summary
Problem
Solution
Submission Checklist
diff-cover) meet the gate enforced by.github/workflows/ci-lite.yml. CI Lite is the authoritative diff-coverage gate; the pre-PR CI Full run is green.## Related.Impact
Related
AI Authored PR Metadata (required for Codex/Linear PRs)
Linear Issue
Commit & Branch
Validation Run
pnpm --filter openhuman-app format:check— N/A: no frontend source change; formatting is covered by CI Lite.pnpm typecheck— N/A: no frontend TypeScript change.Validation Blocked
command:local pnpm rust:checkerror:this box has CMake 3.19 while CEF requires 3.21, and GGML native flags require the documented macOS workaroundimpact:none; the GitHub Actions Tauri shell suite and all three desktop builds passedBehavior Changes
Parity Contract
Duplicate / Superseded PR Handling